If not Hillary, then who? (a poll — give your opinion)

It’s being reported today that Hillary Clinton may announce her candidacy earlier than expected.  Or maybe not.  No one seems sure.

I’m hoping she decides not to run so that some other rising star in the party could step in.  While Hillary would certainly be the front-runner (especially against the current Republican field), she has a lot of baggage.  She’s said some pretty stupid things over the years, and despite the crazy conspiracy theories there are indeed legitimate concerns over some of her actions.<> on February 25, 2014 in Washington, DC.

Hillary also makes it very difficult for Democrats to attack Jeb Bush as being just another one of those insider families that run the country.  We won’t be able to attack political dynasties.

I’m sure she’s considering all this.  If she runs, she could lose.  She could even lose the Democratic primaries again.  Instead, if she doesn’t run, she can be a deal-breaker behind the scenes and be remembered in history as a good Secretary of State.  And she can avoid the huge attack machine the Republicans have ready for her.

But also, I don’t want her.  I think she’s a political animal who doesn’t really stand for that much.  Mind you, I’ll vote for her over any Republican, but I won’t be excited about it.  It will be like when I voted for Mondale and Dukakis (or for that matter, Bill Clinton).  Meh.  Better than the alternative.

The American people like being entranced by someone new.  It certainly worked to Obama’s advantage when he ran against her eight years ago.  He did not have a long record, and that allowed people to project what they want onto him while also making it harder for anyone to attack him on previous positions.

So who would I like? Ah well, if I’m dreaming, I’d chose Elizabeth Warren.  She’s still tie into the “let’s elect the first woman President” vote that Hillary appeals to, but dammit, she’s like the Teddy Roosevelt of our age.  We need someone like her.  (I like Bernie Sanders too for many of those same reasons but I don’t want him to get the nomination because I think he’d lose the general election.)  And there are some other good possibilities, too:  Jim Webb.  Howard Dean.  Tim Kaine. Amy Klobuchar.

Vote for your choice, and give an opinion in the comments!




6 thoughts on “If not Hillary, then who? (a poll — give your opinion)

  1. Two separate issues as always – campaigner versus policy and unfortunately if the candidate is not a good campaigner, it doesn’t matter if I like their policy. Jim Webb is a good guy but a horrible campaigner. He nearly lost his Senate race in VA that he should have had locked up. Dean is also a bad campaigner. Kaine is good but not great. I’m not as familiar with Klobuchar. What I really like about Hillary is that she is prepared to be attacked on the level she will be. While I prefer Warren as someone fresh and she really states her convictions, I’m not sure that Warren is prepared to weather the attacks that will come the nominee’s way, and I think Hillary will not scare the moderates as badly as Warren will.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Even if Hillary runs, I’d rather someone else. I voted against her in 2008 for good reason. Of all those listed here, by far I prefer Sanders the most. Mainly because I fancy someone who fights for the little guy. Which again is why I voted against Corporatist Hillary Clinton in 2008. Sadly the person who won has not been any tougher against corporate influence on the Beltway.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s