I still admire him for speaking his mind, but his decision to have a special election is completely political in nature after all. I have to pull back my statements from before. Silly me, I thought better of him.
You see, he scheduled the special election to fill the empty New Jersey Senate seat for a few weeks before the regular election in November. This will cost the state millions of dollars, and has the express purpose of making sure that all of Cory Booker’s Democratic supporters who will turn out to elect him in October aren’t necessarily going to be there in November when Christie himself faces a Democratic challenger. His worry was that Booker’s supporters would turn out and, while in the booth, also vote for Christie’s opponent. Can’t have that now, can we? So a separate election it is.
Would a Democrat do the same thing? Sure, probably. Doesn’t mean it’s right, and doesn’t mean I’d support it — but then again, who am I to be surprised that there are politics in politics?
He even said a couple of years ago that he’d never do anything like that.
LikeLike
Didn’t someone once propose a law that prohibited special elections in favor of an annual normal/general election? (And stipulated having an appointee fulfill the job until said election.)
LikeLike
Actually, the entire clip of what Christie said about never doing that shows that the comment was taken out of context, so I can’t hold him to that.
LikeLike