Some of my conservative friends have been complaining about the number of mass shootings we’ve had so far this year, rightly pointing out that it all depends on how you define “mass shooting.” Should you include shootings where people were only maimed and didn’t die? How many deaths are needed before it counts as a mass shooting? And so on.
So let’s be generous and assume that the numbers showing an average of about one a day is unrealistic. Sure, let’s cut that in half, and we’ll say it’s only one every other day. Or even one a week.
Just let me know: How many innocent deaths do we need before you will say, “Maybe we should do something about this”?
Fill in the blank for me: “My right to own any deadly weapon free from restriction is worth the lives of _____ people.”
Is there a number? If so, remember: If you haven’t already agreed that maybe we should do something, the number in that blank has to be at least 30,000 a year. If you’ve been an adult for, say, twenty years and have done done nothing to try to prevent all these deaths, then the number in that blank needs to be at least 600,000, or roughly every single person in Seattle, Washington.
No, I don’t want to read another rant about guns. Don’t change the subject, answer the question. If you want to debate guns, search this blog for that topic and you’ll find plenty of threads where your comments will be appropriate and welcome.
So please: Give me a number. Let me know how many innocent dead people it will take before we can sit down and talk reasonably about what we should do about it.