Using religion to justify bigotry

by

Christians are “broken people” who “cause poverty”

A Democratic Mayor of a prominent city recently said that Christians are “broken people” who are not “productive members of society.” She said that they were the “deepest systemic causes of generational poverty.”

This kind of bigotry is unacceptable, of course. We are a land that values our beliefs, and in fact, guarantee the right to believe or not believe in the very first Amendment. To degrade an entire group of people simply because of their beliefs is about as unAmerican as you can get. So you can imagine how people who strongly believe in the 1st Amendment and the values of our country are protesting this woman.

Oh.  Wait.  My mistake.

She didn’t say that about Christians. She said it about atheists.

Well, that’s completely different, isn’t it? Even though some estimates place non-believers in America somewhere in the 30% range (much larger than Jews or Muslims or Mormons or any non-Christian religion), it’s still perfectly acceptable to degrade, insult, and demean non-believers in a way that would ruin the career of any politician saying that about a religious group.

by

Bill Maher was right

You can criticize a religion without advocating for discrimination against the people who practice that religion.

Bill Maher had a great debate with fellow liberals on his show last week.  Ben Affleck accused him of being biased against Muslims for the things Maher said about their religion.  But those are two separate things.

It appears to me that the Islam religion (to some of its followers) is where Christianity was 500 years ago — it does not tolerate dissent, and punishes its enemies with death.affleck3-640x350

Does every Muslim follow that strict doctrine?  No, of course not, just like every Christian does not follow the terrible things in Christianity’s doctrines, either.  Even 500 years ago, there were progressive Christians fighting against the terrible things their church was doing.

So it’s clearly wrong to assume every Muslim believes in the extremist views of that religion any more than you should assume every Christian thinks that adultery or eating shellfish be punishable by stoning to death.

But you can’t deny that there are many more Muslims who believe that certain blasphemy should so be punished.  Don’t believe me? Try drawing a picture of Mohammad and see if you don’t have to go into hiding, even in America.

The key is that liberals need to be consistent and not hypocritical.  You can’t criticize southern Christians for being prejudiced against gays while looking the other way when Muslims sentence their gay citizens to death.  And why do they do that?  Because of their religion … which is not exempt from criticism.

Some people get hung up over the fact that this is a religion, and believe that we should treat it differently.  As I’ve said before, the fact that your bigotry is based on your religious belief doesn’t cancel out the bigotry.  It’s still bigotry no matter how you came by it, and the fact that you really, really believe it doesn’t excuse it.

Followers of Islam who do not believe in such extremism need to force their religion to change.

Partially the problem is the liberal goal of accepting multiculturalism — to embrace our differences, in the same way Mr. Spock teaches us that Vulcans love “infinite diversity in infinite combinations.”  But there are some things we should never accept.  Taking away the rights of others in any culture is wrong.  And, you know, beheading innocent journalists to appease your god is also wrong.

And if we don’t call them out for it, and lay the blame where it belongs with the religious belief that encourages such actions, then we are partners in the crime.